3 Ways The Martian Transcends A Boring Style

the martian by andy weir

By now you’ve heard of Mark Watney’s plight in Andy Weir’s book The Martian. Weir’s blockbuster, self-published book has accomplished what few books ever will. It’s a New York Times best-seller, and there is now a film adaptation starring Matt Damon and Jessica Chastain with director Ridley Scott (Alien and Blade Runner) at the helm.

Astronaut Mark Watney is left for dead on Mars. What follows is a survival tale, painstakingly researched, bursting with scientific facts, and threaded with humor. But at the core, there is Watney, a mostly likable character, who makes wading through Weir’s layers of exposition a worthy struggle.

The book’s popularity flaunts financial success in the face of science fiction writing conventions. Mainly these: “reduce exposition,” “don’t use dialogue to info dump the reader,” and “don’t info dump in general.” These editorial commandments are meant to make prose engaging and less bogged down by a textbook-style presentation dominated by explanation rather than story narrative. Industry wisdom says this expository style bores readers.

The Martian embraces info dumping and exposition sometimes to a mind-numbing effect. But there are three things the novel has going for it that make this presentation bearable:

1) Watney is Likable

Watney is funny,  sometimes charismatic and, most importantly, inventive. It’s his ingenuity that perhaps holds one of the keys to the book’s mass appeal.

He is a scientist survivalist describing to us each modification and calculation needed to accomplish Martian survival. He shares a similar character attribute with Walter White from Breaking Bad: applying scientific knowledge to the available resources around him in order to solve problems.

This is an important characteristic for Mark Watney, maybe more so than for Walter White, because it drives the plot and allows him to continually master his circumstances. It’s perhaps the same appeal a character like MacGyver had for audiences in the 80s and early 90s.

The “master of dire circumstances” type of character turns his knowledge into action to solve problems in unexpected ways. There is dramatic tension in that, the potential for surprise, and the appeal of a character who can do anything he puts his mind to, especially when in danger.

2) Humor

Just when my eyes were tearing up from Watney’s procedures and technical descriptions, he would crack a joke. Not all were funny, but it’s this lightheartedness and positive attitude in the face of death that made most of the humor successful.

3) The Insane Amount of Research

Watney’s likability and humor and his appeal as a problem solver may carry readers through the narrative’s oddities and sometimes daunting exposition, but these characteristics aren’t exactly revolutionary and don’t represent the real achievement of the book.

The real achievement of The Martian is the research.

From how the rovers work to liquefied food destroying a rocket launch, the details expressed in this book convey a crazy level of research and painstaking thought into how Watney’s survival could work. Both the extremely curious and the technically minded will find satisfaction in the “hard science fiction” elements Weir employs.

The technical details and facts were this book’s biggest achievement, yet their presentation made the novel hard to get through to a fault. Presentation and explanation of the technical and the scientific are a common challenge for the science fiction writer. How can we explain science while creating an engaging narrative? It’s a question I imagine all science fiction writers must answer for themselves.

The Martian is a perfect candidate for a movie adaptation and, at times, reads as if it were a screenplay adapted into a novel with characters “exiting” rooms and Watney’s one-liner quips. Films naturally tend to filter out exposition when adapted from books but without the book’s scientific detail, I wonder if the movie will lose the novel’s real achievement.

Opt In Image

Get Armistice for FREE:

One book per person. $3.99 value.

  • 20 Hard-Hitting Stories
  • 4 High-Powered Authors
  • 1 Shared World
  • And No Spandex
  • You're welcome
The following two tabs change content below.

M. J. Kelley

M. J. is an award-winning short fiction writer and author of a forthcoming nonfiction book. He loves science fiction, humor, & literary fiction and is the director of Write Draft Critique: the Virtual Writer Workshop.


  1. A great read. What I loved most about this nuanced view is that you are obviously a fan but your article includes this line: The Martian embraces info dumping and exposition sometimes to a mind-numbing effect. Brilliant 🙂

    1. Thanks for reading, Nillu. I’ve been thinking a lot about the problem of exposition lately. Exposition is a challenging question for writers, particularly those writing speculative fiction. How do we explain without sounding like a textbook? What is exposition’s purpose in fiction and how can it be used as a tool? When is it appropriate to employ it? Things that keep me up at night. This book is an interesting example of when the conventional advice is put aside, and it still was able to reach a big audience.

      Perhaps it’s the combination of “problem solver” and “space survivalist” that fans found irresistible. Worth pondering.

  2. This is a story that, for me, only works because the main character is so relatable. First off, I have read this book twice and listened to it once more. I enjoyed it and for the same reasons you posted here. I was forced to look at it from a writers point of view and try to figure out why a story that is almost all exposition with a pretty anemic (and entirely predictable plot) would make me want to read it again and again. The answer is that we all know a guy like this. Sure he or she isn’t an astronaut, but when your car breaks down, they can fix it with bailing wire. If you have the idea to try to make a micro-brew, they have the still up and running in an afternoon using only what’s in the recycling bin. And the joy of just knowing and figuring things out. For me the character is best summed up as he lays out both maritime and international law to establish that he will in legal fact, become the first space pirate.

    1. Great points, Ethan. Thanks for reading the post and stopping by. I think you’re right. The relatability of Watney is another huge achievement of the book that most likely contributed to its success.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.